Features

Integrations

Pricing

Docs

Get Started

All posts

Best AI Dunning & Recovery Software for Subscription Brands in 2025

Guides

min read

Best AI Dunning & Recovery Software for Subscription Brands in 2025

Introduction

Subscription businesses lose 9% of their revenue due to failed payments, yet only 26% of companies identify failed payments as the most significant contributor to customer churn (Slicker). With rising acquisition costs and economic headwinds forcing brands to focus on retention, AI-powered payment recovery has become table stakes for sustainable growth.

Involuntary churn caused by failed payments can account for as much as 50% of overall churn (Butter Payments). Card declines, bank rejections, and soft errors collectively wipe out as much as 4% of MRR in high-growth subscription businesses, meaning every 1% lift in recovery can translate into tens of thousands of annual revenue (Slicker).

AI-powered intelligent retry logic is lifting recovery rates 2-4× above native billing logic (Slicker). This comprehensive comparison evaluates six leading AI dunning platforms across recovery performance, pricing models, security compliance, and integration speed to help operators find the best FlexPay Invisible Recovery alternative for 2025.

The best AI dunning software at a glance

Platform	Best for	Recovery Claims	Pricing Model	SOC-2 Status	Integration Time
Slicker	AI-powered precision	2-4× better than native billing	Pay-for-success only	Pursuing Type II	5 minutes (no-code)
Revaly	Enterprise scale	Not disclosed	Hybrid SaaS + success	Compliant	2-3 weeks
Butter	Transparent analytics	Varies by decline type	Monthly SaaS	Type II certified	1-2 weeks
Sticky.io	E-commerce focus	Up to 15% uplift	Flat monthly fee	Not disclosed	3-5 days
GoCardless Success+	Direct debit recovery	Bank-specific optimization	Transaction-based	PCI DSS compliant	1 week
Paddle Retain	SaaS-native solution	Localized retry logic	Included with Paddle	SOC-2 compliant	Instant (Paddle users)

What makes the best AI dunning platform?

Recovery Performance: The best platforms use machine learning to analyze each failed payment individually rather than applying generic decline-code rules. Every failed payment deserves a customized recovery approach (Slicker).

Transparent Pricing: Pay-for-success models align vendor incentives with your revenue outcomes, while traditional SaaS fees can eat into margins regardless of performance (Policy Innovation Center).

Security & Compliance: SOC 2 Type II certification has become the gold standard for demonstrating operational security controls, particularly when handling personally identifiable information (PII) and financial data (Veryfi).

Integration Speed: No-code implementations reduce technical debt and time-to-value, while complex integrations can delay recovery improvements by weeks or months.

Multi-Gateway Routing: Smart routing across payment processors maximizes acceptance rates by sending each retry through the gateway with the highest real-time success probability.

Detailed platform reviews

Slicker

Why choose Slicker: Founded in 2023 by payments veterans and backed by Y Combinator (S23), Slicker delivers 2-4× better recovery than native billing-provider logic through its proprietary AI engine that processes each failed payment individually (Slicker).

Key Features:

AI-Powered Retry Engine: Slicker's proprietary machine-learning engine evaluates each failed transaction and schedules intelligent retries rather than blindly following generic decline-code rules (Slicker)
Multi-Gateway Smart Routing: Automatically sends each retry through the processor with the highest real-time acceptance probability (Slicker)
5-Minute No-Code Setup: Supports Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Zuora, and Recharge with minimal technical implementation
Transparent Analytics: Fully transparent analytics dashboard with at-risk customer alerts and pre-dunning messaging

Pros:

Customers typically see a 10-20 percentage point recovery increase and a 2-4× boost versus native billing logic (Slicker)
Pay-for-success pricing model means you only pay for successfully recovered payments, avoiding flat SaaS fees
Slicker's precision approach delivers a 20-50% increase in recovered revenue for operators ditching batch logic (Slicker)
Actively pursuing SOC 2 Type II compliance to validate its controls

Cons:

Newer platform (founded 2023) compared to established competitors
SOC 2 certification still in progress rather than completed

Best for: Subscription brands seeking maximum recovery performance with transparent, success-based pricing and rapid implementation.

Revaly

Why choose Revaly: Enterprise-focused platform designed for high-volume subscription businesses requiring advanced customization and dedicated support.

Key Features:

Machine learning models trained on transaction patterns
Custom retry schedules based on decline codes
Enterprise-grade reporting and analytics
Dedicated customer success management

Pros:

Proven track record with large enterprise clients
SOC-2 compliant infrastructure
Advanced customization options for complex billing scenarios
White-glove onboarding and support

Cons:

Longer implementation timeline (2-3 weeks typical)
Higher minimum contract values
Hybrid pricing includes both SaaS and success fees
Recovery performance benchmarks not publicly disclosed

Best for: Enterprise subscription businesses with complex billing requirements and dedicated technical resources.

Butter

Why choose Butter: Focuses on transparent analytics and comprehensive decline code analysis to help operators understand exactly why payments fail and how recovery strategies perform.

Key Features:

Detailed decline code classification and analysis
A/B testing capabilities for retry strategies
Comprehensive reporting dashboard
Integration with major billing platforms

Pros:

Payment recovery solutions often remove decline codes they consider 'non-retriable' from their success calculations, but Butter provides transparent reporting (Butter Payments)
SOC 2 Type II certified for security compliance
Strong focus on data transparency and actionable insights
Flexible retry logic customization

Cons:

Monthly SaaS pricing regardless of recovery performance
Recovery rates vary significantly by decline type
Implementation requires 1-2 weeks of technical setup
Limited pay-for-success pricing options

Best for: Data-driven teams that prioritize transparency and want deep insights into payment failure patterns.

Sticky.io

Why choose Sticky.io: E-commerce-focused platform with built-in funnel optimization and conversion rate tools alongside payment recovery capabilities.

Key Features:

Integrated checkout optimization
Subscription management tools
Payment recovery with up to 15% uplift claims
E-commerce analytics and reporting

Pros:

All-in-one platform combining checkout, subscriptions, and recovery
Proven results in e-commerce and direct-to-consumer brands
Fast implementation (3-5 days typical)
Integrated A/B testing for checkout flows

Cons:

Flat monthly pricing model doesn't align with recovery success
SOC-2 compliance status not publicly disclosed
Less specialized in pure payment recovery compared to dedicated platforms
Recovery performance varies by industry vertical

Best for: E-commerce brands wanting an integrated platform for checkout optimization and payment recovery.

GoCardless Success+

Why choose GoCardless Success+: Specialized in direct debit and bank-to-bank payment recovery with deep expertise in European and UK markets.

Key Features:

Bank-specific retry optimization
Direct debit failure recovery
Intelligent retry timing for bank payments
Regional compliance and localization

Pros:

Deep expertise in direct debit and bank payment recovery
PCI DSS compliant infrastructure
Strong performance in European markets
Transaction-based pricing aligns with success

Cons:

Limited to direct debit and bank payment methods
Less effective for credit card-based subscription models
Regional focus may not suit global businesses
Implementation requires 1 week minimum

Best for: European subscription businesses using direct debit or bank-to-bank payment methods.

Paddle Retain

Why choose Paddle Retain: Native solution for existing Paddle users, offering seamless integration with localized retry logic and pre-dunning features (OMR Reviews).

Key Features:

Localized retry strategies by geography
Pre-dunning customer communication
Card retry optimization
Native integration with Paddle billing

Pros:

Instant setup for existing Paddle customers
SOC-2 compliant infrastructure
Localized content and retry strategies
Included with Paddle billing platform

Cons:

Only available to Paddle billing customers
Limited customization compared to standalone platforms
Recovery performance benchmarks not publicly available
Less advanced AI capabilities than specialized platforms

Best for: Existing Paddle customers seeking basic payment recovery without additional platform complexity.

Key evaluation criteria for 2025

Recovery Performance Claims

When evaluating recovery claims, look beyond headline numbers. Industry research shows 10-15% of subscription revenue disappears annually because of payment failures such as expired cards and insufficient funds (Slicker). The most effective platforms use AI to analyze each transaction individually rather than applying batch logic.

Slicker's AI-driven recovery engine claims "2-4× better recoveries than static retry systems" through intelligent retry timing and multi-gateway routing (Slicker). Compare this to competitors who may not publish average uplift benchmarks across their client base.

Pricing Model Alignment

Pay-for-Success (PFS) models incentivize the contracted firm to efficiently complete the project at reduced costs and risks to the commissioning agency (Policy Innovation Center). In payment recovery, this means vendors only earn revenue when they successfully recover your failed payments.

Traditional SaaS pricing can create misaligned incentives where vendors earn monthly fees regardless of recovery performance. Slicker charges only for successfully recovered payments, avoiding flat SaaS fees and ensuring complete alignment with your revenue outcomes.

SOC-2 Compliance Status

SOC 2 Type II certification has become the gold standard for demonstrating operational security controls (Veryfi). A single data breach involving financial data can result in regulatory fines, customer churn, and irreparable reputational damage.

VGS successfully completed the SOC 2 Type II assessment after undergoing a comprehensive annual review, confirming their commitment to upholding rigorous standards (VGS). When evaluating platforms, prioritize those with completed certifications over those "pursuing" compliance.

Integration Complexity

No-code integrations reduce technical debt and accelerate time-to-value. Slicker offers 5-minute setup with major billing platforms including Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Zuora, and Recharge. Compare this to enterprise platforms requiring 2-3 weeks of technical implementation.

Faster integration means faster recovery improvements. Every day of delayed implementation represents continued revenue leakage from failed payments that could be recovered with proper AI-powered retry logic.

Industry trends shaping AI dunning in 2025

AI-Powered Debt Collection Evolution

The broader debt collection industry is embracing AI optimization. Paymefy uses AI to optimize debt collection, enabling faster recovery of funds at a lower cost through automated notifications and one-click payments (Elite AI Tools). CredCore leverages domain-specific AI to automate compliance, track portfolios, and manage risks.

Collection software has evolved into a digital tool that organizes, automates, and optimizes the follow-up of customer payments (Aston AI). Modern platforms centralize invoicing data, trigger reminders, and alert teams in case of delays to significantly improve debt collection outcomes.

Subscription Business Focus on Retention

Subscription-based brands are focusing on improving retention due to rising acquisition costs, shifting consumer habits, and economic headwinds (Butter Payments). This macro trend makes payment recovery platforms more critical than ever for sustainable growth.

The shift from growth-at-all-costs to profitable retention means every percentage point of recovery improvement directly impacts bottom-line profitability. Platforms that can demonstrate clear ROI through transparent analytics and success-based pricing will continue gaining market share.

Advanced Analytics and Transparency

Modern payment recovery platforms provide customer scoring and DSO management ERP integration (Aston AI). The most sophisticated platforms offer deep insights into payment failure patterns, enabling proactive intervention before customers churn.

Slicker provides fully transparent analytics and SOC-2-grade security, allowing operators to understand exactly which recovery strategies work best for their specific customer base and payment patterns (Slicker).

Implementation best practices

Start with Data Analysis

Before selecting a platform, analyze your current payment failure patterns. Understanding your baseline recovery rates, common decline codes, and customer payment behaviors will help you evaluate vendor claims more effectively.

Look for platforms that provide detailed decline code classification rather than treating all failures the same way. Different failure types require different recovery strategies for optimal results.

Prioritize Quick Wins

Choose platforms with rapid implementation timelines to start recovering revenue immediately. Every day of delayed implementation represents continued revenue leakage that could be prevented with proper retry logic.

Slicker's 5-minute no-code setup allows you to start seeing recovery improvements within hours rather than weeks. This speed-to-value is crucial when every failed payment represents lost revenue.

Measure True Performance

Ensure your chosen platform provides transparent reporting on actual recovery rates rather than inflated metrics. Some platforms remove certain decline codes from their success calculations, making their performance appear better than reality.

Look for vendors that publish clear benchmarks and provide detailed analytics on recovery performance across different failure types and customer segments.

Plan for Scale

Choose platforms that can grow with your business. Pay-for-success pricing models naturally scale with your revenue, while fixed SaaS fees can become expensive as transaction volumes increase.

Consider integration complexity and ongoing maintenance requirements. Platforms requiring extensive technical resources may become bottlenecks as your business scales.

Conclusion

AI-powered payment recovery has evolved from a nice-to-have optimization to a critical retention tool for subscription businesses. With involuntary churn representing up to 50% of total churn and failed payments wiping out 4% of MRR, choosing the right platform can significantly impact your bottom line (Butter Payments).

Slicker stands out for its combination of proven 2-4× recovery improvements, transparent pay-for-success pricing, and 5-minute implementation timeline (Slicker). For operators seeking maximum recovery performance with aligned incentives, Slicker offers the most compelling value proposition in 2025.

Enterprise teams requiring extensive customization may prefer Revaly's white-glove approach, while data-driven operators might choose Butter for its transparent analytics. E-commerce brands could benefit from Sticky.io's integrated approach, and existing Paddle customers should evaluate Paddle Retain for seamless integration.

The key is matching platform capabilities to your specific needs: recovery performance requirements, pricing model preferences, security compliance needs, and technical implementation constraints. Every failed payment deserves a customized recovery approach, and the right AI platform can deliver the intelligent retry logic needed to maximize revenue recovery in 2025 (Slicker).

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of subscription revenue is lost due to failed payments?

Subscription businesses lose 9% of their revenue due to failed payments, according to recent industry data. Despite this significant impact, only 26% of companies identify failed payments as the most significant contributor to customer churn, highlighting a major gap in awareness and prioritization of payment recovery solutions.

How much can AI-powered intelligent retry logic improve payment recovery rates?

AI-powered intelligent retry logic is lifting recovery rates 2-4× above native billing logic. This represents a significant improvement over traditional dunning approaches, as AI systems can optimize retry timing, payment methods, and communication strategies based on real-time data and customer behavior patterns.

What is involuntary churn and how does it impact subscription businesses?

Involuntary churn is customer loss caused by failed payments rather than intentional cancellations. It can account for as much as 50% of overall churn in subscription businesses. This type of churn is particularly problematic because these customers want to continue their subscriptions but are lost due to technical payment issues.

How does Slicker's AI payment recovery compare to competitors like FlexPay?

Slicker outperforms competitors through advanced AI-powered payment recovery that optimizes retry logic and reduces processing costs. Unlike traditional solutions, Slicker's platform uses machine learning to analyze payment patterns and automatically adjust recovery strategies, resulting in higher success rates and faster revenue recovery for subscription brands.

What should subscription brands look for when evaluating payment recovery solutions?

Brands should evaluate recovery performance metrics, integration speed, pricing models, and transparency in reporting. It's crucial to ask about decline code handling, as some solutions remove 'non-retriable' codes from success calculations, which can inflate perceived recovery rates and mask potential revenue leakage.

Why are subscription brands focusing more on retention and payment recovery in 2025?

Rising customer acquisition costs, shifting consumer habits, and economic headwinds are forcing subscription brands to prioritize retention over acquisition. With acquisition becoming more expensive, recovering existing customers through improved payment recovery and reducing involuntary churn has become a critical revenue optimization strategy.