Guides
10
min read
Dunning Emails vs. Automatic AI Retries: Which Wins in 2025?
Introduction
Subscription businesses face a critical choice in 2025: rely on traditional dunning emails to recover failed payments, or embrace AI-powered automatic retries that promise higher recovery rates and better customer experiences. With up to 12% of card-on-file transactions failing due to expirations, insufficient funds, or network glitches, the stakes have never been higher (Slicker). A single payment hiccup can drive 35% of users to cancel, especially in hyper-competitive SaaS and media markets (Slicker).
The traditional approach centers on dunning emails—automated messages that notify customers about failed payments and request manual action. However, AI-powered retry engines are revolutionizing payment recovery by learning from every declined transaction, scheduling intelligent retries, and routing payments through optimal gateways (Slicker). This comprehensive analysis examines both approaches, using real-world data to determine which strategy delivers superior results in 2025.
The Current State of Payment Recovery in 2025
The Scale of the Problem
Involuntary churn has reached epidemic proportions across subscription businesses. Up to 70% of involuntary churn stems from failed transactions—customers who never intended to leave but are forced out when a card is declined (Slicker). The financial impact is staggering: Paddle's analysis of 2,000+ SaaS companies found involuntary churn accounts for 13-15% of total churn across segments (Slicker).
The problem extends beyond simple card declines. In some industries, decline rates reach 30%—and each one represents a potential lost subscriber (Slicker). Even more concerning, a staggering 62% of users who hit a payment error never return to the site (Slicker). This data underscores why payment recovery strategy has become a make-or-break decision for subscription businesses.
AI's Growing Role in Business Operations
The 2025 AI landscape has shifted dramatically toward practical applications. AI leaders are integrating AI into their core business processes, not just running isolated pilots (Slicker). Machine-learning initiatives deliver productivity improvement in the mid-teens to the high twenties (Slicker). This trend toward reliable agents that can plan, take multi-step actions, and operate software on behalf of users is reshaping how businesses approach payment recovery (From San Francisco to Europe: The 2025 Playbook for Building Agentic AI That Scales).
Traditional Dunning Emails: The Email-First Approach
How Dunning Emails Work
Dunning emails represent the traditional approach to payment recovery, typically following a structured sequence:
Immediate notification: Customer receives an email within hours of payment failure
Reminder sequence: Follow-up emails sent at 3, 7, and 14-day intervals
Final notice: Last attempt before service suspension
Account suspension: Service terminated if payment remains unresolved
This approach relies heavily on customer action—they must read the email, understand the issue, and manually update their payment information or retry the transaction.
Strengths of Email-Based Recovery
Transparency and Communication: Dunning emails excel at keeping customers informed about payment issues. They provide clear explanations of what went wrong and specific steps to resolve the problem.
Established Customer Expectations: Most customers expect email notifications for billing issues. This familiarity can reduce confusion and support tickets.
Compliance and Documentation: Email sequences create a clear audit trail for regulatory compliance and customer service purposes.
Limitations of Traditional Dunning
Customer Friction: The email-first approach places the burden of resolution entirely on the customer. They must take multiple steps: read the email, log into their account, update payment information, and manually retry the transaction.
Timing Issues: Emails arrive on the customer's schedule, not when payment conditions are optimal. A customer might receive a dunning email when their account has insufficient funds, leading to another failed attempt.
Limited Intelligence: Traditional dunning systems lack the ability to analyze why payments failed or determine the optimal retry strategy for each specific case.
AI-Powered Automatic Retries: The Intelligence-First Approach
How AI Retry Engines Work
AI-powered payment recovery systems take a fundamentally different approach, using machine learning to optimize every aspect of the retry process. These systems analyze vast amounts of transaction data to predict the optimal timing, method, and gateway for each retry attempt (Slicker).
The process typically involves:
Real-time failure classification: AI instantly categorizes the decline reason and assesses recovery probability
Dynamic retry scheduling: Machine learning determines the optimal timing for retry attempts based on historical patterns
Multi-gateway routing: Failed payments are automatically routed to alternative payment processors
Continuous learning: Each attempt feeds back into the system, improving future predictions
Advanced AI Capabilities in 2025
The AI landscape has evolved significantly, with 2025 marking a turning point for open-source AI models that have narrowed the gap between proprietary and accessible solutions (Top 10 Open Source AI Models of 2025: Comprehensive Review). This advancement has enabled more sophisticated payment recovery systems that can:
Predict customer behavior: AI can identify at-risk accounts weeks before cancellation, providing businesses with a head start to address issues (Customer Churn Prediction: AI That Identified At-Risk Accounts 47 Days Before Cancellation)
Personalize retry strategies: Machine learning models analyze patterns to flag at-risk accounts and customize recovery approaches (How AI Agents Can Help Reduce Customer Churn)
Optimize payment orchestration: AI enables businesses to construct payment strategies that are optimal for their particular business needs (Spreedly Solutions Stack: Analyze Your Payments)
Performance Advantages
Machine-learning engines predict the perfect moment, method, and gateway for each retry, lifting recovery rates 2-4× above native billing logic (Slicker). This dramatic improvement stems from several factors:
Intelligent Timing: AI systems learn when customers are most likely to have sufficient funds or when temporary network issues are resolved.
Gateway Optimization: Different payment processors have varying success rates for different types of transactions. AI automatically routes retries through the most promising gateway.
Failure Pattern Recognition: Machine learning identifies subtle patterns in decline codes, customer behavior, and external factors that human-designed rules would miss.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Key Metrics
Recovery Rate Performance
Metric | Dunning Emails | AI Automatic Retries | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
Overall Recovery Rate | 15-25% | 35-65% | 2-4× better |
Time to Recovery | 3-14 days | 1-72 hours | 10-20× faster |
Customer Action Required | 100% | 0% | Complete automation |
Gateway Optimization | Manual | Automatic | Dynamic routing |
The data clearly shows AI retries delivering superior performance across all key metrics. Machine-learning engines achieve recovery rates 2-4× higher than traditional approaches while dramatically reducing time-to-cash (Slicker).
Customer Experience Impact
Friction Reduction: AI retries eliminate customer friction entirely. Instead of receiving multiple emails and needing to take manual action, customers experience seamless payment recovery in the background.
Retention Benefits: Since it's 5-7× cheaper to save an existing subscriber than acquire a new one, the improved retention from AI retries delivers significant ROI (Slicker).
Support Ticket Reduction: Automated recovery reduces customer confusion and support inquiries, freeing up customer service resources for higher-value activities.
Financial Performance
Real-world implementations demonstrate significant financial benefits. An AI-powered collection assistant deployed by EY Ireland led to a 22% reduction in the accounts receivable period (How an AI-powered collection assistant optimised accounts receivables). The system automated customer profiling and payment analytics, delivering measurable improvements in cash flow.
Industry Benchmarks and Case Studies
Chargebee's Smart Dunning Baseline
Chargebee's Smart Dunning represents the current state-of-the-art for email-first approaches. Their system includes:
Customizable email sequences
Retry logic based on decline codes
Integration with multiple payment gateways
Detailed analytics and reporting
While sophisticated, this approach still relies primarily on customer action and lacks the predictive intelligence of AI-powered systems.
GoCardless AI Retry Performance
GoCardless has implemented AI-driven retry logic that analyzes transaction patterns and optimizes retry timing. Their system demonstrates how machine learning can significantly improve recovery rates even within traditional payment processing frameworks.
Slicker's AI-Powered Results
Slicker's proprietary AI engine processes each failing payment individually, converting past due invoices into revenue (Slicker). The platform uses a state-of-the-art machine learning model to schedule and retry failed payments at optimal times, leveraging industry expertise and tens of parameters (Slicker).
Key performance indicators include:
2-4× better recovery rates than native billing provider logic
Support for major billing platforms (Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Zuora, Recharge)
SOC 2 Type-II compliance pursuit for enterprise security
5-minute no-code integration setup
The Hybrid Model: Best of Both Worlds
Why Hybrid Approaches Win
While AI retries clearly outperform traditional dunning emails, the optimal strategy in 2025 combines both approaches strategically. The hybrid model follows this sequence:
AI Retries First: Automatic intelligent retries handle the majority of recoverable payments
Humanized Dunning Second: For payments that AI cannot recover, personalized dunning emails provide transparency and manual recovery options
Predictive Intervention: AI identifies at-risk customers before payment failures occur
Implementation Strategy
Phase 1: AI-First Recovery (0-72 hours)
Immediate failure classification and intelligent retry scheduling
Multi-gateway routing for optimal success rates
Continuous learning from each attempt
Zero customer friction during this phase
Phase 2: Intelligent Dunning (72+ hours)
Personalized emails based on AI insights about failure reasons
Targeted messaging that addresses specific customer situations
Clear action steps with optimized timing
Integration with customer success workflows
Phase 3: Predictive Prevention
AI monitoring for early warning signs of payment issues
Proactive customer outreach before failures occur
Card expiration notifications and update prompts
Risk-based customer segmentation
Maximizing LTV and Minimizing Chargebacks
The hybrid approach maximizes customer lifetime value (LTV) by:
Reducing Involuntary Churn: AI retries recover more payments automatically, keeping customers active longer.
Improving Customer Experience: Customers experience fewer payment interruptions and service disruptions.
Optimizing Communication: When dunning emails are necessary, they're more targeted and effective based on AI insights.
Preventing Future Issues: Predictive analytics help identify and resolve potential payment problems before they occur.
Chargeback reduction occurs through:
Faster payment resolution reducing dispute windows
Better customer communication preventing confusion
Improved payment success rates reducing failed transaction volume
Implementation Considerations for 2025
Technical Requirements
Data Quality: Only 37% of firms deem their data-quality efforts successful (Slicker). Implementing AI-powered payment recovery requires clean, comprehensive transaction data to train machine learning models effectively.
Integration Complexity: Modern AI retry systems offer no-code integration options, with some platforms supporting 5-minute setup processes (Slicker). However, organizations must ensure compatibility with existing billing systems and payment processors.
Security and Compliance: SOC 2 Type-II compliance is becoming table stakes for payment recovery platforms, ensuring enterprise-grade security for sensitive financial data (Slicker).
Organizational Readiness
Change Management: Transitioning from email-first to AI-first recovery requires organizational buy-in and process changes. Teams must adapt to new workflows and success metrics.
Performance Monitoring: AI systems require different KPIs than traditional dunning approaches. Organizations need dashboards that track recovery rates, retry timing, gateway performance, and customer satisfaction.
Continuous Optimization: Machine learning models improve over time, but they require ongoing monitoring and adjustment to maintain peak performance.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Implementation Costs: While AI-powered systems may have higher upfront costs, the improved recovery rates typically deliver positive ROI within months.
Operational Savings: Reduced customer support tickets, fewer manual interventions, and improved cash flow offset technology investments.
Competitive Advantage: Early adopters of AI payment recovery gain significant advantages in customer retention and operational efficiency.
Future Trends and Predictions
AI Evolution in Payment Recovery
The 2025 AI trend toward reliable agents that can plan and execute multi-step actions is transforming payment recovery (From San Francisco to Europe: The 2025 Playbook for Building Agentic AI That Scales). Future systems will likely include:
Predictive Customer Lifecycle Management: AI will predict and prevent payment issues weeks before they occur, similar to systems that can identify at-risk accounts 47 days before cancellation (Customer Churn Prediction: AI That Identified At-Risk Accounts 47 Days Before Cancellation).
Cross-Platform Intelligence: AI systems will learn from payment patterns across multiple businesses and industries, improving recovery rates through collective intelligence.
Real-Time Optimization: Advanced systems will adjust retry strategies in real-time based on current market conditions, network status, and customer behavior patterns.
Regulatory and Compliance Evolution
As AI becomes more prevalent in financial services, regulatory frameworks will evolve to address:
Algorithmic transparency requirements
Customer consent for automated payment retries
Data privacy protections for machine learning models
Fair lending and non-discrimination compliance
Industry Standardization
The payment recovery industry is moving toward standardized APIs and protocols that will enable:
Easier integration between AI systems and billing platforms
Improved data sharing for better machine learning outcomes
Standardized metrics for comparing system performance
Conclusion: The Verdict for 2025
The data overwhelmingly supports AI-powered automatic retries as the superior approach for payment recovery in 2025. With recovery rates 2-4× higher than traditional dunning emails and dramatically reduced time-to-cash, AI systems deliver measurable improvements in both financial performance and customer experience (Slicker).
However, the optimal strategy isn't purely AI-first or email-first—it's a hybrid approach that leverages the strengths of both methods. AI retries should handle the initial recovery attempts, maximizing automatic success rates while minimizing customer friction. When AI retries are unsuccessful, intelligent dunning emails informed by AI insights provide the transparency and manual recovery options that some customers prefer.
The key success factors for 2025 include:
Prioritize AI-first recovery for maximum efficiency and customer experience
Implement intelligent dunning as a secondary strategy for complex cases
Focus on data quality to enable effective machine learning
Ensure robust security and compliance to meet enterprise requirements
Monitor and optimize continuously to maximize system performance
Businesses that embrace this hybrid model will maximize customer lifetime value, minimize involuntary churn, and gain significant competitive advantages in an increasingly AI-driven marketplace. The question isn't whether to adopt AI-powered payment recovery—it's how quickly you can implement it to start capturing the benefits (Slicker).
As we move deeper into 2025, the gap between AI-powered and traditional payment recovery will only widen. Organizations that act now will position themselves for sustained growth, while those that delay risk falling behind in the race for customer retention and revenue optimization.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main differences between dunning emails and AI automatic retries?
Dunning emails are manual notifications sent to customers about failed payments, requiring customer action to resolve issues. AI automatic retries use machine learning to intelligently reschedule payment attempts at optimal times without customer intervention, analyzing patterns like bank processing schedules and customer behavior to maximize success rates.
How effective are AI-powered payment retries compared to traditional dunning emails?
AI-powered retries significantly outperform traditional dunning emails by processing each failing payment individually and leveraging tens of parameters to optimize retry timing. According to Slicker's proprietary AI engine, this approach converts more past due invoices into revenue by scheduling retries when they're most likely to succeed, rather than relying on customer response to emails.
What percentage of card-on-file transactions typically fail?
Up to 12% of card-on-file transactions fail due to various reasons including card expirations, insufficient funds, or network glitches. This high failure rate makes choosing the right payment recovery strategy critical for subscription businesses, as it directly impacts revenue and customer retention.
Can AI predict payment failures before they happen?
Yes, AI can predict payment issues and customer churn weeks in advance. Machine learning models analyze customer behavior patterns, payment history, and engagement levels to identify at-risk accounts up to 47 days before cancellation, allowing businesses to proactively address issues and implement targeted retention strategies.
How do AI agents help reduce customer churn in payment recovery?
AI agents reduce customer churn through predictive analysis, personalized engagement, and efficient problem-solving. They analyze vast amounts of customer data including purchase history and behavior patterns to predict churn, then automatically implement recovery strategies without creating friction for customers who would otherwise receive multiple dunning emails.
What makes 2025 a turning point for AI in payment recovery?
2025 marks a significant shift toward reliable AI agents that can plan and take multi-step actions autonomously. With reasoning-first foundation models like OpenAI's o3 family and Meta's Llama 4 becoming available, AI systems can now make more sophisticated decisions about payment retry timing and customer engagement strategies, making them more effective than traditional dunning approaches.
Sources
WRITTEN BY
Slicker
Slicker
