Guides
10
min read
Pay-for-Success Pricing Demystified: Calculating True Cost per Recovered Payment with Slicker, FlexPay and GoCardless
Introduction
Payment recovery isn't just about getting your money back—it's about understanding exactly what each recovered dollar costs your business. While traditional flat-fee models charge regardless of results, pay-for-success pricing aligns vendor incentives with your outcomes, but calculating the true cost per recovered payment requires deeper analysis than surface-level commission rates.
Industry data shows that businesses lose on average 7.2% of subscribers monthly due to 'passive churn', which includes customers who have lapsed because of changes to their payment methods or expired cards (Recurly). With 30% of churn being involuntary and caused by failed payments (GoCardless), finance leaders need precise cost models to evaluate recovery solutions across different pricing structures.
This analysis builds comprehensive cost-per-recovery models for three distinct approaches: Slicker's pure pay-for-success model, FlexPay's hybrid structure, and GoCardless Success+'s flat-fee approach. Using real pricing data and industry recovery rates, we'll demonstrate how outcome-based pricing can slash financial risk while accelerating ROI across $1K, $50K, and $500K MRR scenarios.
Understanding Pay-for-Success vs. Traditional Pricing Models
What is Pay-for-Success Pricing?
Pay-for-success pricing represents a fundamental shift from traditional SaaS models where vendors charge monthly fees regardless of performance. Instead, providers only collect payment when they successfully recover failed transactions, creating perfect alignment between vendor success and client outcomes.
Slicker pioneered this approach in the payment recovery space, charging only for successfully recovered payments while avoiding flat SaaS fees (Slicker Pricing). This model eliminates upfront risk and ensures every dollar spent directly correlates to revenue recovered.
Traditional Pricing Model Challenges
Flat-fee models create several financial inefficiencies:
Fixed costs regardless of performance: You pay the same amount whether the solution recovers 10% or 50% of failed payments
Upfront investment risk: Monthly fees start immediately, but recovery benefits may take weeks to materialize
Misaligned incentives: Vendors profit from subscriptions, not necessarily from your recovery success
GoCardless Success+ exemplifies this traditional approach, using payment intelligence to retry payments on optimal days but charging flat monthly fees (GoCardless). While effective, this structure requires CFOs to calculate break-even points and assume performance risk.
Hybrid Models: The Middle Ground
FlexPay represents a hybrid approach, combining base platform fees with success-based commissions. This model provides vendors with predictable revenue while sharing some performance risk with clients. However, it still requires upfront investment and doesn't eliminate fixed costs entirely.
The True Cost Calculation Framework
To accurately compare pricing models, we need a comprehensive framework that accounts for:
Direct costs: Platform fees, success commissions, setup charges
Opportunity costs: Time to value, implementation resources
Risk factors: Performance guarantees, contract flexibility
Scale economics: How costs change with volume
Key Metrics for Comparison
Metric | Definition | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
Cost per Recovered Payment | Total costs ÷ Number of payments recovered | Direct efficiency measure |
Recovery Rate | Payments recovered ÷ Total failed payments | Performance indicator |
Time to ROI | Months until recovered revenue > total costs | Cash flow impact |
Risk-Adjusted Cost | Cost per recovery × (1 - performance guarantee) | True risk assessment |
Slicker's Pay-for-Success Model Deep Dive
How Slicker's Pricing Works
Slicker's proprietary AI engine processes each failed payment individually and schedules intelligent, data-backed retries rather than blindly following generic decline-code rules (Slicker). The company charges only for successfully recovered payments, with the first month completely free (Slicker Pricing).
This approach delivers several key advantages:
Zero upfront risk: No monthly fees or setup costs
Performance alignment: Slicker only profits when you recover revenue
Transparent pricing: Clear commission structure with no hidden fees
Slicker's Recovery Performance
Customers typically see a 10-20 percentage point recovery increase and a 2-4× boost versus native billing logic (Slicker). This precision approach delivers a 20-50% increase in recovered revenue for operators ditching batch logic (Slicker).
The platform's AI automatically sends each retry through the processor with the highest real-time acceptance probability, while every retry is logged so finance can export evidence for compliance reviews at any moment (Slicker).
Cost Calculation for Slicker
For Slicker's pay-for-success model:
FlexPay's Hybrid Model Analysis
Understanding FlexPay's Structure
FlexPay combines a base platform fee with success-based commissions, creating a hybrid model that provides vendors with predictable revenue while sharing performance risk. This approach typically includes:
Monthly platform fees ranging from $500-$2,000 based on transaction volume
Success commissions of 15-25% on recovered payments
Setup and integration fees
Cost Calculation for FlexPay
GoCardless Success+ Flat-Fee Model
GoCardless Success+ Overview
GoCardless Success+ uses payment intelligence to retry payments on the best day for each customer, successfully collecting 99% of instant one-off payments and 97.3% of automated recurring payments on the first try (GoCardless). However, this performance comes with fixed monthly costs regardless of recovery volume.
Flat-Fee Cost Structure
Typical GoCardless Success+ pricing includes:
Monthly platform fees: $200-$1,500 based on transaction volume
Per-transaction fees: $0.05-$0.15 per retry attempt
Setup and integration costs
Cost Calculation for GoCardless Success+
Scenario Analysis: $1K MRR Business
Baseline Assumptions
Monthly Recurring Revenue: $1,000
Average Payment Value: $50
Failed Payment Rate: 8% (industry average)
Failed Payments per Month: 1.6 payments
Baseline Recovery Rate: 30% (native billing logic)
Slicker Pay-for-Success Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 50% (20pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 0.8 per month
Commission Rate: 25%
Cost Analysis:
FlexPay Hybrid Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 45% (15pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 0.72 per month
Platform Fee: $200/month
Commission Rate: 20%
Cost Analysis:
GoCardless Success+ Flat-Fee Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 40% (10pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 0.64 per month
Platform Fee: $150/month
Per-Transaction Fee: $0.10
Cost Analysis:
$1K MRR Scenario Summary
Model | Cost per Recovery | Monthly ROI | Break-even MRR |
|---|---|---|---|
Slicker | $12.50 | 300% | $200 |
FlexPay | $287.78 | -83% | $8,000 |
GoCardless | $234.63 | -79% | $6,000 |
Scenario Analysis: $50K MRR Business
Baseline Assumptions
Monthly Recurring Revenue: $50,000
Average Payment Value: $125
Failed Payment Rate: 8%
Failed Payments per Month: 32 payments
Baseline Recovery Rate: 30%
Slicker Pay-for-Success Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 55% (25pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 17.6 per month
Commission Rate: 22%
Cost Analysis:
FlexPay Hybrid Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 48% (18pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 15.36 per month
Platform Fee: $800/month
Commission Rate: 18%
Cost Analysis:
GoCardless Success+ Flat-Fee Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 42% (12pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 13.44 per month
Platform Fee: $600/month
Per-Transaction Fee: $0.08
Cost Analysis:
$50K MRR Scenario Summary
Model | Cost per Recovery | Monthly ROI | Time to Break-even |
|---|---|---|---|
Slicker | $27.50 | 354% | Immediate |
FlexPay | $74.58 | 68% | 1.2 months |
GoCardless | $44.83 | 179% | 1.0 months |
Scenario Analysis: $500K MRR Business
Baseline Assumptions
Monthly Recurring Revenue: $500,000
Average Payment Value: $250
Failed Payment Rate: 7% (better payment hygiene at scale)
Failed Payments per Month: 140 payments
Baseline Recovery Rate: 35%
Slicker Pay-for-Success Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 65% (30pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 91 per month
Commission Rate: 20% (volume discount)
Cost Analysis:
FlexPay Hybrid Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 58% (23pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 81.2 per month
Platform Fee: $2,000/month
Commission Rate: 15%
Cost Analysis:
GoCardless Success+ Flat-Fee Model
Performance Metrics:
Enhanced Recovery Rate: 52% (17pp improvement)
Recovered Payments: 72.8 per month
Platform Fee: $1,500/month
Per-Transaction Fee: $0.06
Cost Analysis:
$500K MRR Scenario Summary
Model | Cost per Recovery | Monthly ROI | Annual Savings vs Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Slicker | $50.00 | 400% | $218,400 |
FlexPay | $62.13 | 302% | $183,060 |
GoCardless | $20.72 | 1,106% | $200,299 |
Risk Analysis and Hidden Costs
Performance Risk Assessment
Pay-for-success models eliminate performance risk entirely—if the solution doesn't recover payments, you don't pay. Traditional models require careful risk assessment:
Risk Factors to Consider:
Minimum performance guarantees
Contract flexibility and exit clauses
Integration complexity and time to value
Vendor financial stability
Hidden Costs in Traditional Models
Flat-fee models often include hidden costs that inflate true cost per recovery:
Setup and Integration Fees: $2,000-$10,000 one-time costs
Professional Services: Implementation consulting at $150-$300/hour
Minimum Commitments: Annual contracts with early termination penalties
Feature Limitations: Additional fees for advanced analytics or reporting
Implementation and Opportunity Costs
Slicker's no-code integration supports a 5-minute setup with drop-in SDK connections to Stripe, Chargebee, Recurly, Zuora, and Recharge (Slicker). This rapid deployment contrasts sharply with traditional solutions requiring weeks of engineering sprints.
Time to Value Comparison:
Slicker: Same-day implementation, immediate recovery improvements
FlexPay: 2-4 weeks integration, 1-2 months to full optimization
GoCardless: 1-3 weeks setup, immediate retry capabilities
Advanced Cost Optimization Strategies
Volume-Based Pricing Negotiations
As MRR scales, negotiate volume discounts:
Pay-for-success models: Commission rates typically decrease 2-5% at $100K+ MRR
Hybrid models: Platform fees may include volume tiers with better per-transaction rates
Flat-fee models: Enterprise pricing often includes unlimited retries or enhanced features
Multi-Vendor Strategies
Some enterprises deploy multiple recovery solutions:
Primary solution for standard failed payments
Specialized solution for high-value or complex transactions
Backup solution for geographic or processor-specific challenges
This approach requires careful cost modeling to avoid overlap and ensure positive ROI across all vendors.
Performance Monitoring and Optimization
Regardless of pricing model, continuous optimization drives down cost per recovery:
A/B testing different retry schedules and messaging
Segmentation by customer value, payment method, or failure reason
Integration optimization to reduce false positives and improve targeting
Slicker's in-depth payment analytics dashboard provides fully transparent analytics for continuous optimization (Slicker). The platform highlights at-risk customers that are likely to experience payment failure, enabling proactive intervention (Slicker).
Industry Benchmarks and Best Practices
Recovery Rate Benchmarks by Industry
Industry research shows significant variation in recovery rates:
SaaS/Software: 40-60% recovery rates with AI-powered solutions
E-commerce: 35-50% depending on payment method mix
Digital Media: 45-65% with sophisticated retry logic
B2B Services: 50-70% due to higher customer engagement
Recurly recovered over $794 million in revenue for its customers in 2021, representing a 32% year-over-year growth from 2020 (Recurly). This demonstrates the massive scale of payment recovery opportunities across industries.
Cost per Recovery Benchmarks
Based on our analysis across different MRR levels:
MRR Range | Pay-for-Success | Hybrid Model | Flat-Fee Model |
|---|---|---|---|
$1K-$10K | $10-$25 | $150-$400 | $100-$300 |
$10K-$100K | $25-$50 | $50-$150 | $30-$80 |
$100K-$1M | $40-$80 | $60-$120 | $20-$50 |
$1M+ | $50-$100 | $70-$140 | $15-$40 |
Implementation Best Practices
Start with pilot programs: Test solutions on a subset of failed payments
Establish baseline metrics: Measure current recovery rates and costs
Set performance thresholds: Define minimum acceptable improvement levels
Plan for scale: Choose solutions that grow with your business
Monitor continuously: Track cost per recovery and adjust strategies
Vindicia Retain utilizes AI and Machine Learning to automatically recapture up to 50% of failed transactions, including issues like expired cards, suspicious activity, and insufficient funds (Vindicia). This benchmark demonstrates the potential for significant recovery improvements with advanced AI solutions.
Making the Right Choice for Your Business
Decision Framework
Choose your payment recovery pricing model based on:
Pay-for-Success (Slicker) if:
You want zero upfront risk
Cash flow is tight or unpredictable
You prefer aligned vendor incentives
Implementation speed is critical
Hybrid Model (FlexPay) if:
You have predictable cash flow for platform fees
You want shared risk with some vendor commitment
You need extensive customization or white-label options
You're comfortable with longer implementation timelines
Flat-Fee (GoCardless Success+) if:
You have high transaction volumes (500K+ MRR)
You want predictable monthly costs
You have dedicated technical resources for optimization
You prefer traditional vendor relationships
ROI Calculation Worksheet
Use this framework to calculate ROI for any payment recovery solution:
WRITTEN BY
Slicker
Slicker
